Start from a workflow. Make every step yours.
A workflow is a fixed sequence of steps, with approval points, that is the same for everyone who runs it. When you ask Forge for something, it picks the workflow that fits and skips any step the job does not need. These are the built-in starting points; open any card to see its steps.
You don’t have to pick from this list.
You don’t need to read this page to use Forge. Say “forge,” and what you’re working on, and Forge picks from the workflows you have switched on, at the start of a session or partway through. Naming a workflow works too.
A built-in workflow for every stage.
Each built-in workflow is a maintained starting point for one stage of the software development lifecycle. Use it as it comes, or tailor every step, approval point, and skill. Where a description says “work item,” it means a ticket in Jira, Linear, or Notion.
Shape and scope the work before any code is written — discovery, definition, PRDs, and readiness.
Steps
- Check for existing work items
- Gather background context
- Clarify requirements
- Collect non-functional requirements
- Write the problem statement
- Score impact (RICE)
- Preview & create the tracker work item
- Generate the PRD
- Build the tech handoff plan
Map the system and shape the technical approach for an existing work item.
Steps
- Resolve the work item
- Scan the system architecture
- Interactive architecture discussion — record decisions
Steps
- Locate any existing atlas
- Discover the estate across repos and services
- Synthesize the findings into one picture
- Validate the reconstruction
- Publish the atlas
- Render the visual map
Turn a ready work item into shipped code, one wave (a batch of stories built together) at a time.
Steps
- Check for prior planning on the ticket
- Fetch the work item
- Readiness check
- Analyze change impact (blast radius)
- Technical discovery
- Define the test strategy
- Write the implementation proposal
- Notify the engineering lead
Steps
- Receive the engineering handoff
- Readiness check
- Break the work into stories
- Plan dependencies & implementation waves
- Analyze change impact (blast radius)
- Technical discovery
- Define the test strategy
- Implement wave by wave
- Review the PR
- Complete & summarize delivery
Verify quality before and after the change lands — test strategy and structured PR review.
Steps
- Fetch the work item
- Readiness check
- Check AC quality & testability
- Review stories (INVEST)
- Analyze change impact
- Technical discovery
- Define the test strategy
Steps
- Fetch the work item
- Check branch freshness
- AI-augmented PR review — analysis, AC traceability, OWASP scan
- Customer impact analysis
- Surface manual deploy tasks
Work out what's shipping, then ship it — gated, versioned, and announced.
Steps
- Resolve the release scope
- Run pre-release gates — CI, blockers, migrations
- Draft versioned release notes
Steps
- Resolve the release scope
- Run pre-release gates
- Check branch freshness
- Reconcile traceability to tracked work
- Build the release notes
- Plan the rollout
- Plan observability
- Cut the release
- Plan feature exposure
- Publish & announce
Capture and resolve defects end to end.
Steps
- Capture the bug — severity, area, reproduction
- Preview & create the ticket
- Hand off to engineering
- Implement the fix (optional)
- Review the PR & surface deploy tasks (optional)
Stay on top of work already in flight — status, documentation, and edits.
Steps
- Fetch the work item
- Report status — progress, acceptance criteria, PR health
Steps
- Reconstruct the work item from the branch
- Offer to create or link a tracked item
Steps
- Fetch the work item
- Fetch tracker and PR comments
- Filter out ones already handled
- Discuss each remaining comment to an agreed recommendation
Shorter or narrower paths that share steps with the workflows above.
Every step, approval point, and skill — yours to configure.
Every workflow is a list of steps you control. Each step carries a model tier, an approval point, and the skills it should use — set once for the whole organization, or tailored for a single team.
One feature, start to finish.
Here's how a team uses Forge workflows to ship one complex feature — from a fuzzy idea to a reviewed pull request — each person reaching for the right workflow, whether it's a Forge default or a version their team has customized.
Pressure-tests the idea before anyone commits — frames the problem, checks roadmap fit, and scores it so only work worth doing moves forward.
Turns the validated idea into a scoped work item (PROJ-412) with a PRD and acceptance criteria, then hands off cleanly to the engineering lead.
Scans the codebase through your AI tool, then runs an interactive architecture discussion — surfacing the key technical questions and recording every decision before code begins.
Maps a test strategy to every acceptance criterion — unit, integration, and end-to-end coverage — while the code is still being written, not after.
Builds the feature wave by wave against the agreed plan — briefed on the architecture up front, so the first pass starts from the agreed design — and opens a pull request.
A QA-team fork adds extra code-quality and test-coverage scans, pausing the run for sign-off when coverage slips.
A DevOps-team fork checks the change's impact on infrastructure performance and cost before it ships.
A status snapshot whenever it's needed: progress, acceptance criteria, and PR health, posted to the ticket in Jira, Linear, or Notion, so nobody has to chase updates.
You don't have to start with Forge.
You can bring Forge in at any point. Most work starts as a blank prompt and only turns into something worth tracking halfway through. Ask for a workflow forty turns in, and it picks up from where you are: the conversation, the files you opened, and the decisions you made carry into it.
An engineer opens Claude Code and starts chasing a checkout bug. No ticket, no process — a blank prompt and forty minutes of digging through the codebase.
The root cause is a rounding helper three teams depend on. Suddenly this needs a ticket, a test strategy, and a review trail — and none of that exists yet.
It files the bug with what's already been found — the reproduction, the root cause, the files touched — then runs the fix as a workflow, with approval points, from there. Nothing gets re-explained, and the last forty turns land in the record instead of evaporating.
Some workflows exist precisely for work already in flight — they assume a session, a branch, or a ticket that's been running for a while, and meet it where it is.
Reads the commits and diff on the branch you've been working on and reconstructs what you actually built — acceptance criteria mapped to real code and tests — then drafts the work item nobody wrote up front.
Pulls new comments from the ticket and its pull request, drops the ones already handled, and walks through the rest with you — built for the middle of an implementation, not the start of one.
A status snapshot whenever it's needed: progress, acceptance criteria, and PR health, posted to the ticket in Jira, Linear, or Notion.
Runs the full structured review — code analysis, requirement traceability, security scan — on a PR that was opened without Forge ever being involved.
Works out what would ship right now from the delta since the last release, checks for blockers, and drafts the notes — without tagging or publishing anything.
Your process, your workflows.
Need something the defaults don't cover? An admin says so in Claude Code, Codex, or Cursor — “forge, create a workflow for our incident postmortems” — and describes it in plain English from there. Forge drafts it, shows exactly what changes, and saves it — across the organization, or tailored for a single team.
An admin asks in plain English, Forge shows the proposed workflow, and it saves only after the admin confirms.
What you can ask for
Just say what you want — no skill name to remember, no config files, no YAML. Each example shows something you could type (left) and the workflow Forge builds in response (right): extend a default, fork it for one team, or create a brand-new path.
A new capable-tier step that scans Terraform, Kubernetes, and cloud-config diffs and surfaces cost impact before the review step completes.
A QA-scoped fork of PR Review with an added coverage check set to Always asks — the run pauses for sign-off when coverage drops.
A fast-tier step that refreshes your CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md so agent guidance keeps up with the code.
A step set to Always asks, wired to your security-review skill, for runs that touch authentication or PII.
A brand-new path — three ordered steps ending in a required human approval before the run continues.
Find out which of these
fit how you work.
Ask Forge for what you need and it names the workflow that fits. For a team, guided setup recommends a set, with a reason for each. Free for individuals.